Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective

About

DeepSeek-R1-Zero has shown that reinforcement learning (RL) at scale can directly enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs without supervised fine-tuning. In this work, we critically examine R1-Zero-like training by analyzing its two core components: base models and RL. We investigate a wide range of base models, including DeepSeek-V3-Base, to understand how pretraining characteristics influence RL performance. Our analysis reveals that DeepSeek-V3-Base already exhibit ''Aha moment'', while Qwen2.5 base models demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities even without prompt templates, suggesting potential pretraining biases. Additionally, we identify an optimization bias in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which artificially increases response length (especially for incorrect outputs) during training. To address this, we introduce Dr. GRPO, an unbiased optimization method that improves token efficiency while maintaining reasoning performance. Leveraging these insights, we present a minimalist R1-Zero recipe that achieves 43.3% accuracy on AIME 2024 with a 7B base model, establishing a new state-of-the-art. Our code is available at https://github.com/sail-sg/understand-r1-zero.

Zichen Liu, Changyu Chen, Wenjun Li, Penghui Qi, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Wee Sun Lee, Min Lin• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMATH500 (test)
Accuracy73
895
Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy (ARC)78.8
598
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy (Acc)78
543
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy40
479
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500--
442
Code GenerationMBPP (test)--
405
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Top-1 Accuracy89.6
384
Mathematical ReasoningAMC
Accuracy (%)61.2
368
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24
Accuracy33.4
318
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy6.7
311
Showing 10 of 228 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update