Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Verifier-free Test-Time Sampling for Vision-Language-Action Models

About

Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in robot control. However, they remain fundamentally limited in tasks that require high precision due to their single-inference paradigm. While test-time scaling approaches using external verifiers have shown promise, they require additional training and fail to generalize to unseen conditions. We propose Masking Distribution Guided Selection (MG-Select), a novel test-time scaling framework for VLAs that leverages the model's internal properties without requiring additional training or external modules. Our approach utilizes KL divergence from a reference action token distribution as a confidence metric for selecting the optimal action from multiple candidates. We introduce a reference distribution generated by the same VLA but with randomly masked states and language conditions as inputs, providing action uncertainty while remaining aligned with the target task distribution. Additionally, we propose a joint training strategy that enables the model to learn both conditional and unconditional distributions by applying dropout to state and language conditions, thereby further improving the quality of the reference distribution. Our experiments demonstrate that MG-Select provides a reliable reference for action selection through task-relevant condition masking and consistently improves base models across diverse simulation and real-world benchmarks.

Suhyeok Jang, Dongyoung Kim, Changyeon Kim, Youngsuk Kim, Jinwoo Shin• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Long-horizon Success Rate82.7
165
Robot ManipulationLIBERO Object
Success Rate73
139
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Long
Success Rate55
97
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Spatial Object Goal Long
Overall Success Rate (Long)55.4
91
Robotic ManipulationRoboCasa
Average Success Rate62.9
68
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate76.8
58
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Goal
Success Rate73
55
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Average across suites
Success Rate (SR)71
29
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Spatial
Success Rate (SR)82
28
Language-conditioned long-horizon robotic manipulationCalvin ABC->D
Success Rate (1 Task)96.9
22
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update