Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RobustMerge: Parameter-Efficient Model Merging for MLLMs with Direction Robustness

About

Fine-tuning pre-trained models with custom data leads to numerous expert models on specific tasks. Merging models into one universal model to empower multi-task ability refraining from data leakage has gained popularity. With the expansion in data and model size, parameter-efficient tuning becomes the common practice for obtaining task-specific models efficiently. However, few methods are dedicated to efficient merging, and existing methods designed for full fine-tuning merging fail under efficient merging. To address the issue, we analyze from low-rank decomposition and reveal that direction robustness during merging is crucial for merging efficient modules. We furthermore uncover that compensating for the gap between stark singular values contributes to direction robustness. Therefore, we propose RobustMerge, a training-free parameter-efficient merging method with complementary parameter adaptation to maintain direction robustness. Specifically, we (1) prune parameters and scale coefficients from inter-parameter relation for singular values to maintain direction stability away from task interference, and (2) perform cross-task normalization to enhance unseen task generalization. We establish a benchmark consisting of diverse multimodal tasks, on which we conduct experiments to certify the outstanding performance and generalizability of our method. Additional studies and extensive analyses further showcase the effectiveness. Code is available at https://github.com/AuroraZengfh/RobustMerge.

Fanhu Zeng, Haiyang Guo, Fei Zhu, Li Shen, Hao Tang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringChartQA--
371
Image CaptioningCOCO--
130
Natural Language InferenceQNLI--
61
Visual Question AnsweringIconQA
Top-1 Acc82.3
57
Visual Question AnsweringDocVQA (val)
ANLS82.1
47
Image ClassificationDTD
Average Accuracy63.3
19
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Average Accuracy63.3
19
Image ClassificationGTSRB
Average Accuracy63.3
18
Image ClassificationMNIST
Average Accuracy63.3
18
Image ClassificationSUN397
Average Accuracy63.3
18
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Follow for update