Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Tuning without Peeking: Provable Generalization Bounds and Robust LLM Post-Training

About

Gradient-based optimization is the workhorse of deep learning, offering efficient and scalable training via backpropagation. However, exposing gradients during training can leak sensitive information about the underlying data, raising privacy and security concerns such as susceptibility to data poisoning attacks. In contrast, black-box optimization methods, which treat the model as an opaque function, relying solely on function evaluations to guide optimization, offer a promising alternative in scenarios where data access is restricted, adversarial risks are high, or overfitting is a concern. This paper introduces BBoxER, an evolutionary black-box method for LLM post-training that induces an information bottleneck via implicit compression of the training data. Leveraging the tractability of information flow, we provide non-vacuous generalization bounds and strong theoretical guarantees for robustness to data poisoning attacks and extraction attacks, while ensuring privacy by design. In experiments with LLMs, we demonstrate empirically that black-box optimization methods-despite the scalability and computational challenges inherent to black-box approaches-are able to learn, showing how a few iterations of BBoxER improve performance, generalize well on a benchmark of reasoning datasets, and are robust to membership inference attacks. This positions BBoxER as an attractive add-on on top of gradient-based optimization, offering suitability for deployment in restricted environments while also providing non-vacuous generalization guarantees.

Ismail Labiad, Mathurin Videau, Matthieu Kowalski, Marc Schoenauer, Alessandro Leite, Julia Kempe, Olivier Teytaud• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy (ARC)55.61
631
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy42.48
589
Question AnsweringARC Easy
Accuracy83.16
246
Mathematical ReasoningGSM-PLUS
Accuracy (GSM+)62.27
22
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K (test)
Accuracy83.55
9
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update