Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention

About

Despite their powerful capabilities, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) suffer from considerable computational overhead due to their reliance on massive visual tokens. Recent studies have explored token pruning to alleviate this problem, which typically uses text-vision cross-attention or [\texttt{CLS}] attention to assess and discard redundant visual tokens. In this work, we identify a critical limitation of such attention-first pruning approaches, i.e., they tend to preserve semantically similar tokens, resulting in pronounced performance drops under high pruning ratios. To this end, we propose {HoloV}, a simple yet effective, plug-and-play visual token pruning framework for efficient inference. Distinct from previous attention-first schemes, HoloV rethinks token retention from a holistic perspective. By adaptively distributing the pruning budget across different spatial crops, HoloV ensures that the retained tokens capture the global visual context rather than isolated salient features. This strategy minimizes representational collapse and maintains task-relevant information even under aggressive pruning. Experimental results demonstrate that our HoloV achieves superior performance across various tasks, MLLM architectures, and pruning ratios compared to SOTA methods. For instance, LLaVA1.5 equipped with HoloV preserves 95.8\% of the original performance after pruning 88.9\% of visual tokens, achieving superior efficiency-accuracy trade-offs.

Xin Zou, Di Lu, Yizhou Wang, Yibo Yan, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Xu Zheng, Linfeng Zhang, Xuming Hu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy79.5
1165
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy55.8
1117
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy85
935
Multimodal EvaluationMME--
557
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy60.6
496
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy61.7
374
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA IMG
Accuracy71.7
256
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench CN
Accuracy55.1
162
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQA)
Accuracy68.9
128
Multimodal EvaluationMM-Vet--
122
Showing 10 of 38 rows

Other info

Follow for update