Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CLARity: Reasoning Consistency Alone Can Teach Reinforced Experts

About

Training expert LLMs in domains with scarce data is difficult, often relying on multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, standard outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) on MCQs is risky. While it may improve accuracy, we observe it often degrades reasoning quality such as logical consistency. Existing solutions to supervise reasoning, such as large-scale Process Reward Models (PRMs), are prohibitively expensive. To address this, we propose CLARity, a cost-effective RL framework that enhances reasoning quality using only a small, general-purpose LLM. CLARity integrates a consistency-aware reward mechanism with a 2-stage refine-then-monitor training pipeline to enhance reasoning consistency, and a dynamic data reformulation strategy to to better exploit limited data. Experiments demonstrate that CLARity improves response consistency by 16.5% and accuracy by 7.5% over baselines. Human evaluations further confirm holistic improvements in coherence and professionalism. Thus, CLARity offers a generalizable solution that enables smaller models to effectively guide expert models by reasoning consistency. Our code is open sourced at: https://github.com/Infinite-set/CLARity

Jiuheng Lin, Cong Jiang, Zirui Wu, Jiarui Sun, Yansong Feng• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Legal ReasoningJEC-QA Legal (val)
Accuracy+54.4
9
Medical ReasoningMedQA-USMLE Medical Non-MCQ
Accuracy22.6
9
Legal ReasoningJEC-QA Legal Non-MCQ
Accuracy27.2
9
Medical ReasoningMedQA-USMLE Medical (val)
Accuracy+63.3
9
Legal ReasoningLegal domain (val)
Correctness3.1
2
Medical ReasoningMedical domain (val)
Correctness3.8
2
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update