From Action Labels to Sets: Rethinking Action Supervision for Imitation Learning from Corrective Feedback
About
Behavior cloning (BC) optimizes policies by treating human demonstrations as pointwise action labels. While effective with accurate action labels, this formulation is brittle in practice: when human-provided actions are imperfect, treating each label as an exact target can steer the policy away from the underlying desired behavior, particularly when expressive models are used (e.g., energy-based models). As a result, we propose a human-in-the-loop alternative that replaces pointwise supervision with set-valued action targets. We introduce Contrastive policy Learning from Interactive Corrections (CLIC). CLIC leverages human corrections to construct and refine sets of desired actions, and optimizes a policy to place probability mass over these sets rather than over a single action target. This formulation naturally accommodates both absolute and relative corrections and can represent complex multi-modal behaviors. Extensive simulation and real-robot experiments show that the proposed approach leads to effective policy learning across diverse settings: CLIC remains competitive with the state of the art under accurate data while being substantially more robust under noisy, relative, and partial feedback. Our implementation is publicly available at https://clic-webpage.github.io/.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic Manipulation | Push-T Gaussian Noise | Success Rate (SR)96 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Square Gaussian Noise | Success Rate92.5 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Pick-Can Gaussian Noise | Success Rate (SR)100 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | TwoArm-Lift Gaussian Noise | Success Rate (SR)94.5 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Push-T Directional Noise | Success Rate (SR)95 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Square Directional Noise | Success Rate (SR)91 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Pick-Can Directional Noise | Success Rate (SR)100 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | TwoArm-Lift Directional Noise | Success Rate (SR)98 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation Simulation | TwoArm-Lift simulation (partial feedback) | Success Rate99 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation Simulation | Push-T simulation relative feedback | Success Rate (SR)85.3 | 8 |