Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

From Action Labels to Sets: Rethinking Action Supervision for Imitation Learning from Corrective Feedback

About

Behavior cloning (BC) optimizes policies by treating human demonstrations as pointwise action labels. While effective with accurate action labels, this formulation is brittle in practice: when human-provided actions are imperfect, treating each label as an exact target can steer the policy away from the underlying desired behavior, particularly when expressive models are used (e.g., energy-based models). As a result, we propose a human-in-the-loop alternative that replaces pointwise supervision with set-valued action targets. We introduce Contrastive policy Learning from Interactive Corrections (CLIC). CLIC leverages human corrections to construct and refine sets of desired actions, and optimizes a policy to place probability mass over these sets rather than over a single action target. This formulation naturally accommodates both absolute and relative corrections and can represent complex multi-modal behaviors. Extensive simulation and real-robot experiments show that the proposed approach leads to effective policy learning across diverse settings: CLIC remains competitive with the state of the art under accurate data while being substantially more robust under noisy, relative, and partial feedback. Our implementation is publicly available at https://clic-webpage.github.io/.

Zhaoting Li, Rodrigo P\'erez-Dattari, Robert Babuska, Cosimo Della Santina, Jens Kober• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robotic ManipulationPush-T Gaussian Noise
Success Rate (SR)96
8
Robotic ManipulationSquare Gaussian Noise
Success Rate92.5
8
Robotic ManipulationPick-Can Gaussian Noise
Success Rate (SR)100
8
Robotic ManipulationTwoArm-Lift Gaussian Noise
Success Rate (SR)94.5
8
Robotic ManipulationPush-T Directional Noise
Success Rate (SR)95
8
Robotic ManipulationSquare Directional Noise
Success Rate (SR)91
8
Robotic ManipulationPick-Can Directional Noise
Success Rate (SR)100
8
Robotic ManipulationTwoArm-Lift Directional Noise
Success Rate (SR)98
8
Robotic Manipulation SimulationTwoArm-Lift simulation (partial feedback)
Success Rate99
8
Robotic Manipulation SimulationPush-T simulation relative feedback
Success Rate (SR)85.3
8
Showing 10 of 21 rows

Other info

Follow for update