Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Backdoor Collapse: Eliminating Unknown Threats via Known Backdoor Aggregation in Language Models

About

Backdoor attacks are a significant threat to large language models (LLMs), often embedded via public checkpoints, yet existing defenses rely on impractical assumptions about trigger settings. To address this challenge, we propose \ourmethod, a defense framework that requires no prior knowledge of trigger settings. \ourmethod is based on the key observation that when deliberately injecting known backdoors into an already-compromised model, both existing unknown and newly injected backdoors aggregate in the representation space. \ourmethod leverages this through a two-stage process: \textbf{first}, aggregating backdoor representations by injecting known triggers, and \textbf{then}, performing recovery fine-tuning to restore benign outputs. Extensive experiments across multiple LLM architectures demonstrate that: (I) \ourmethod reduces the average Attack Success Rate to 4.41\% across multiple benchmarks, outperforming existing baselines by 28.1\%$\sim$69.3\%$\uparrow$. (II) Clean accuracy and utility are preserved within 0.5\% of the original model, ensuring negligible impact on legitimate tasks. (III) The defense generalizes across different types of backdoors, confirming its robustness in practical deployment scenarios.

Liang Lin, Miao Yu, Moayad Aloqaily, Zhenhong Zhou, Kun Wang, Linsey Pang, Prakhar Mehrotra, Qingsong Wen• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Jailbreak DefenseAdvBench--
115
Backdoor DefenseLLM Backdoor Defense (test)
ASR13.28
30
Backdoor MitigationSFT-based Poisoning Word trigger
Clean Accuracy (CACC)96.2
18
Backdoor MitigationSFT-based Poisoning Long trigger
Clean Accuracy (CACC)94.7
18
Backdoor MitigationSFT-based Poisoning Phrase trigger
Clean Accuracy (CACC)95.4
18
Sentiment AnalysisSST2
CACC96.2
6
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update