Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

X-VLA: Soft-Prompted Transformer as Scalable Cross-Embodiment Vision-Language-Action Model

About

Successful generalist Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models rely on effective training across diverse robotic platforms with large-scale, cross-embodiment, heterogeneous datasets. To facilitate and leverage the heterogeneity in rich, diverse robotic data sources, we propose a novel Soft Prompt approach with minimally added parameters, by infusing prompt learning concepts into cross-embodiment robot learning and introducing separate sets of learnable embeddings for each distinct data source. These embeddings serve as embodiment-specific prompts, which in unity empower VLA models with effective exploitation of varying cross-embodiment features. Our new X-VLA, a neat flow-matching-based VLA architecture, relies exclusively on soft-prompted standard Transformer encoders, enjoying both scalability and simplicity. Evaluated across 6 simulations as well as 3 real-world robots, our 0.9B instantiation-X-VLA-0.9B simultaneously achieves SOTA performance over a sweep of benchmarks, demonstrating superior results on a wide axes of capabilities, from flexible dexterity to quick adaptation across embodiments, environments, and tasks. Website: https://thu-air-dream.github.io/X-VLA/

Jinliang Zheng, Jianxiong Li, Zhihao Wang, Dongxiu Liu, Xirui Kang, Yuchun Feng, Yinan Zheng, Jiayin Zou, Yilun Chen, Jia Zeng, Ya-Qin Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, Jingjing Liu, Tai Wang, Xianyuan Zhan• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Object Achievement98.6
1025
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate98.2
570
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO-Plus
Language Understanding Score75.7
414
Robot ManipulationLIBERO (test)
Average Success Rate98.1
237
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate98.2
223
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Long-horizon Success Rate97.6
165
Robotic ManipulationCalvin ABCD→D
Avg Length4.151
139
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO v1 (test)
Average Success Rate98.1
118
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0
Average Success Rate72.85
115
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Long Success Rate97.6
108
Showing 10 of 152 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update