Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantization

About

The optimal bit-width for achieving the best trade-off between quantized model size and accuracy has been a subject of ongoing debate. While some advocate for 4-bit quantization, others propose that 1.58-bit offers superior results. However, the lack of a cohesive framework for different bits has left such conclusions relatively tenuous. We present ParetoQ, the first unified framework that facilitates rigorous comparisons across 1-bit, 1.58-bit, 2-bit, 3-bit, and 4-bit quantization settings. Our findings reveal a notable learning transition between 2 and 3 bits: For 3-bits and above, the fine-tuned models stay close to their original pre-trained distributions, whereas for learning 2-bit networks or below, the representations change drastically. By optimizing training schemes and refining quantization functions, ParetoQ surpasses all previous methods tailored to specific bit widths. Remarkably, our ParetoQ ternary 600M-parameter model even outperforms the previous SoTA ternary 3B-parameter model in accuracy, using only one-fifth of the parameters. Extensive experimentation shows that ternary, 2-bit, and 3-bit quantization maintains comparable performance in the size-accuracy trade-off and generally exceeds 4-bit and binary quantization. Considering hardware constraints, 2-bit quantization offers promising potential for memory reduction and speedup.

Zechun Liu, Changsheng Zhao, Hanxian Huang, Sijia Chen, Jing Zhang, Jiawei Zhao, Scott Roy, Lisa Jin, Yunyang Xiong, Yangyang Shi, Lin Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Bilge Soran, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Tijmen Blankevoort, Vikas Chandra• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingWikiText2
Perplexity10.89
3785
Language ModelingC4
Perplexity12.4
1688
Language ModelingC4
Perplexity40.07
1565
Zero-shot ReasoningReasoning Suite Zero-shot (PIQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, ARC-e, ARC-c) (val test)
Average Accuracy44.1
297
Zero-shot EvaluationEight datasets average
Accuracy55.7
112
Zero-shot Common Sense ReasoningZero-shot Suite (PIQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, ARC-e, ARC-c) (test)
PIQA64.5
95
Language ModelingWikiText-2 (val)
Perplexity (BVS)13.1
70
Zero-shot Commonsense ReasoningARC-Easy, ARC-Challenge, HellaSwag, PIQA, WinoGrande lm-evaluation-harness (test)
ARC-e Accuracy49.8
43
ReasoningReasoning Benchmarks ARC-e, ARC-c, BoolQ, PIQA, SIQA, HellaS., OBQA, Wino.
ARC-e Accuracy67.9
38
Zero-shot EvaluationEvaluation Benchmarks Zero-shot
Average Accuracy70.9
34
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update