Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Uni-LoRA: One Vector is All You Need

About

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the de facto parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method for large language models (LLMs) by constraining weight updates to low-rank matrices. Recent works such as Tied-LoRA, VeRA, and VB-LoRA push efficiency further by introducing additional constraints to reduce the trainable parameter space. In this paper, we show that the parameter space reduction strategies employed by these LoRA variants can be formulated within a unified framework, Uni-LoRA, where the LoRA parameter space, flattened as a high-dimensional vector space $R^D$, can be reconstructed through a projection from a subspace R^d, with $d \ll D$. We demonstrate that the fundamental difference among various LoRA methods lies in the choice of the projection matrix, $P \in R^{D \times d}$.Most existing LoRA variants rely on layer-wise or structure-specific projections that limit cross-layer parameter sharing, thereby compromising parameter efficiency. In light of this, we introduce an efficient and theoretically grounded projection matrix that is isometric, enabling global parameter sharing and reducing computation overhead. Furthermore, under the unified view of Uni-LoRA, this design requires only a single trainable vector to reconstruct LoRA parameters for the entire LLM - making Uni-LoRA both a unified framework and a "one-vector-only" solution. Extensive experiments on GLUE, mathematical reasoning, and instruction tuning benchmarks demonstrate that Uni-LoRA achieves state-of-the-art parameter efficiency while outperforming or matching prior approaches in predictive performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/KaiyangLi1992/Uni-LoRA.

Kaiyang Li, Shaobo Han, Qing Su, Wei Li, Zhipeng Cai, Shihao Ji• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy86.5
2019
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score1.37e+3
727
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy59
524
Image ClassificationRESISC45
Accuracy96.43
472
Image ClassificationStanfordCars
Accuracy88.9
384
Multi-discipline Multimodal UnderstandingMMMU
Accuracy35
363
Image ClassificationCIFAR100
Accuracy93.58
301
Image ClassificationOxfordPets
Accuracy94.65
298
Image ClassificationCIFAR10
Accuracy (%)99.15
282
Scientific Question AnsweringScienceQA image
Accuracy70.3
259
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update