Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

MAFA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Enterprise-Scale Annotation with Configurable Task Adaptation

About

We present MAFA (Multi-Agent Framework for Annotation), a production-deployed system that transforms enterprise-scale annotation workflows through configurable multi-agent collaboration. Addressing the critical challenge of annotation backlogs in financial services, where millions of customer utterances require accurate categorization, MAFA combines specialized agents with structured reasoning and a judge-based consensus mechanism. Our framework uniquely supports dynamic task adaptation, allowing organizations to define custom annotation types (FAQs, intents, entities, or domain-specific categories) through configuration rather than code changes. Deployed at JP Morgan Chase, MAFA has eliminated a 1 million utterance backlog while achieving, on average, 86% agreement with human annotators, annually saving over 5,000 hours of manual annotation work. The system processes utterances with annotation confidence classifications, which are typically 85% high, 10% medium, and 5% low across all datasets we tested. This enables human annotators to focus exclusively on ambiguous and low-coverage cases. We demonstrate MAFA's effectiveness across multiple datasets and languages, showing consistent improvements over traditional and single-agent annotation baselines: 13.8% higher Top-1 accuracy, 15.1% improvement in Top-5 accuracy, and 16.9% better F1 in our internal intent classification dataset and similar gains on public benchmarks. This work bridges the gap between theoretical multi-agent systems and practical enterprise deployment, providing a blueprint for organizations facing similar annotation challenges.

Mahmood Hegazy, Aaron Rodrigues, Azzam Naeem• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
FAQ annotationBanking FAQ proprietary (test)
Top-1 Accuracy35.5
7
FAQ annotationBanking FAQ
Top-1 Accuracy35.5
7
FAQ annotationLCQMC (test)
Top-1 Accuracy69.4
5
FAQ matchingFiQA
Top-1 Accuracy61.2
5
Intent ClassificationBanking77
Top-1 Accuracy87.3
4
Intent ClassificationInternal Banking
Top-1 Accuracy83.7
4
Intent ClassificationCLINIC-150
Top-1 Accuracy90.1
4
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update