Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization

About

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) has significantly advanced the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it struggles to break through the inherent capability boundaries of the base LLM, due to its essentially on-policy strategy coupled with LLM's immense action space and sparse reward. Critically, RLVR can lead to the capability boundary collapse, narrowing the LLM's problem-solving scope. To address this problem, we propose RL-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for LLMs that synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models. RL-PLUS integrates two core components, i.e., Multiple Importance Sampling to address distributional mismatch from external data, and Exploration-Based Advantage Function to guide the model towards high-value, unexplored reasoning paths. We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach. Compared with existing RLVR methods, RL-PLUS achieves 1) state-of-the-art performance on six math reasoning benchmarks; 2) superior performance on six out-of-distribution reasoning tasks; 3) consistent and significant gains across diverse model families, with average relative improvements up to 69.2\%. Moreover, the analysis of Pass@k curves indicates that RL-PLUS effectively resolves the capability boundary collapse problem.

Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Yongding Tao, Huanyu Liu, Kechi Zhang, Lili Mou, Rongyu Cao, Yingwei Ma, Jue Chen, Binhua Li, Zhi Jin, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, Ge Li• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy (Acc)90.2
543
Mathematical ReasoningAMC
Accuracy (%)68.1
368
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva
Pass@1 Accuracy43.8
289
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 25
Pass@1 Accuracy25.9
178
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiad
Accuracy0.588
134
Science Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy82.3
108
Science Question AnsweringGPQA Diamond
Accuracy40.4
59
Code GenerationHumanEval OOD--
39
Geometric ReasoningGeometry3K (test)
Accuracy36.94
22
Geometry Problem SolvingGeoQA (test)
Choice Accuracy46.42
13
Showing 10 of 21 rows

Other info

Follow for update