Auto-ARGUE: LLM-Based Report Generation Evaluation
About
Generation of citation-backed reports is a primary use case for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. While open-source evaluation tools exist for various RAG tasks, tools designed for report generation are lacking. Accordingly, we introduce Auto-ARGUE, a robust LLM-based implementation of the recently proposed ARGUE framework for report generation evaluation. We present analysis of Auto-ARGUE on the report generation pilot task from the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR track and on two tasks from the TREC 2024 RAG track, showing good system-level correlations with human judgments. Additionally, we release ARGUE-Viz, a web app for visualization and fine-grained analysis of Auto-ARGUE judgments and scores.
William Walden, Marc Mason, Orion Weller, Laura Dietz, John Conroy, Neil Molino, Hannah Recknor, Bryan Li, Gabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Yu Hou, Dawn Lawrie, James Mayfield, Eugene Yang• 2025
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report Generation Evaluation | RAGTIME | Spearman's Rho0.748 | 3 | |
| Report Generation Evaluation | NeuCLIR | Spearman's Rho0.804 | 3 |
Showing 2 of 2 rows