HarmRLVR: Weaponizing Verifiable Rewards for Harmful LLM Alignment
About
Recent advancements in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have gained significant attention due to their objective and verifiable reward signals, demonstrating strong performance in reasoning and code generation tasks. However, the potential safety risks associated with RLVR remain underexplored. This paper presents HarmRLVR, the first systematic investigation into the alignment reversibility risk of RLVR. We show that safety alignment can be rapidly reversed using GRPO with merely 64 harmful prompts without responses, causing models to readily comply with harmful instructions. Across five models from Llama, Qwen, and DeepSeek, we empirically demonstrate that RLVR-based attacks elevate the average harmfulness score to 4.94 with an attack success rate of 96.01\%, significantly outperforming harmful fine-tuning while preserving general capabilities. Our findings reveal that RLVR can be efficiently exploited for harmful alignment, posing serious threats to open-source model safety. Please see our code at https://github.com/lyxx2535/HarmRLVR.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adversarial Attack Success Rate | AdvBench | ASR99.04 | 90 | |
| Attack Success Rate | HEX-PHI | Attack Success Rate94.67 | 63 | |
| Jailbreak attack success rate | HarmBench | Attack Success Rate (Generated)97 | 55 | |
| Harmfulness Evaluation | AdvBench | Harmfulness Score4.99 | 28 | |
| Harmfulness Evaluation | HarmBench | Harmful Response Ratio4.96 | 27 | |
| General Knowledge Evaluation | Accuracy Benchmark | Accuracy88.93 | 15 | |
| Utility Evaluation | Utility Benchmark | Utility Score8.05 | 15 | |
| Safety Evaluation | HEX-PHI | Harm Score4.83 | 15 | |
| Jailbreak Attack Success | JailbreakBench | -- | 10 | |
| Harmful Response Generation | HEx-PHI and AdvBench (test) | ASR96.86 | 7 |