Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Exploring Cross-Modal Flows for Few-Shot Learning

About

Aligning features from different modalities, is one of the most fundamental challenges for cross-modal tasks. Although pre-trained vision-language models can achieve a general alignment between image and text, they often require parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for further adjustment. Today's PEFT methods (e.g., prompt tuning, LoRA-based, or adapter-based) always selectively fine-tune a subset of parameters, which can slightly adjust either visual or textual features, and avoid overfitting. In this paper, we are the first to highlight that all existing PEFT methods perform one-step adjustment. It is insufficient for complex (or difficult) datasets, where features of different modalities are highly entangled. To this end, we propose the first model-agnostic multi-step adjustment approach by learning a cross-modal velocity field: Flow Matching Alignment (FMA). Specifically, to ensure the correspondence between categories during training, we first utilize a fixed coupling strategy. Then, we propose a noise augmentation strategy to alleviate the data scarcity issue. Finally, we design an early-stopping solver, which terminates the transformation process earlier, improving both efficiency and accuracy. Compared with one-step PEFT methods, FMA has the multi-step rectification ability to achieve more precise and robust alignment. Extensive results have demonstrated that FMA can consistently yield significant performance gains across various benchmarks and backbones, particularly on challenging datasets.

Ziqi Jiang, Yanghao Wang, Long Chen• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy87.7
660
Image ClassificationUCF101
Top-1 Acc87.1
527
ClassificationCars
Accuracy65.8
492
Image ClassificationFood101
Accuracy87.4
457
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy77.2
450
Image ClassificationImageNet
Top-1 Accuracy73.5
366
Image ClassificationPets
Accuracy90.5
308
Image ClassificationOxford Flowers 102
Accuracy99.1
234
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy91
226
Image ClassificationOxford-IIIT Pet
Accuracy93.2
219
Showing 10 of 21 rows

Other info

Follow for update