From Local to Global: Revisiting Structured Pruning Paradigms for Large Language Models
About
Structured pruning is a practical approach to deploying large language models (LLMs) efficiently, as it yields compact, hardware-friendly architectures. However, the dominant local paradigm is task-agnostic: by optimizing layer-wise reconstruction rather than task objectives, it tends to preserve perplexity or generic zero-shot behavior but fails to capitalize on modest task-specific calibration signals, often yielding limited downstream gains. We revisit global structured pruning and present GISP, Global Iterative Structured Pruning, a post-training method that removes attention heads and MLP channels using first-order, loss-based important scores aggregated at the structure level with block-wise normalization. Built on this global importance metric, GISP adopts an iterative schedule, rather than one-shot pruning, stabilizes accuracy at higher sparsity, and mitigates perplexity collapse without requiring intermediate fine-tuning. Importantly, the iterative pruning forms nested subnetworks that support a ''prune-once, deploy-many'' workflow. Furthermore, GISP defines structural importance directly with respect to a target loss, making it easy to adapt pruning to task-specific objectives. In this work, we use perplexity for language modeling and a margin-based objective for decision-style tasks. Extensive experiments show that across Llama2-7B/13B, Llama3-8B, and Mistral-0.3-7B, GISP consistently lowers WikiText-2 perplexity and improves on downstream accuracy, with especially strong gains at 40-50% sparsity; on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-3-8B and Qwen3-8B with GSM8K, task-aligned calibration substantially boosts exact-match accuracy. The implementation is available at https://github.com/uncc-efficient-ai/GISP.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language Modeling | WikiText-2 | Perplexity (PPL)18.17 | 2320 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | GSM8K (test) | Accuracy90.52 | 954 | |
| Arithmetic Reasoning | GSM8K | Accuracy90.52 | 272 | |
| Medical Question Answering | MedQA | Accuracy31.26 | 124 | |
| Commonsense Reasoning | CMQA | CMQA Accuracy (%)67.61 | 88 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MathQA (test) | Accuracy73 | 52 | |
| Text Generation | WikiText-2 | Perplexity15.1 | 50 | |
| Question Answering | CMQA (test) | Accuracy42.17 | 5 |