Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SSL4RL: Revisiting Self-supervised Learning as Intrinsic Reward for Visual-Language Reasoning

About

Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown remarkable abilities by integrating large language models with visual inputs. However, they often fail to utilize visual evidence adequately, either depending on linguistic priors in vision-centric tasks or resorting to textual shortcuts during reasoning. Although reinforcement learning (RL) can align models with desired behaviors, its application to VLMs has been hindered by the lack of scalable and reliable reward mechanisms. To overcome this challenge, we propose SSL4RL, a novel framework that leverages self-supervised learning (SSL) tasks as a source of verifiable rewards for RL-based fine-tuning. Our approach reformulates SSL objectives-such as predicting image rotation or reconstructing masked patches-into dense, automatic reward signals, eliminating the need for human preference data or unreliable AI evaluators. Experiments show that SSL4RL substantially improves performance on both vision-centric and vision-language reasoning benchmarks. Furthermore, through systematic ablations, we identify key factors-such as task difficulty, model scale, and semantic alignment with the target domain-that influence the effectiveness of SSL4RL tasks, offering new design principles for future work. We also demonstrate the framework's generality by applying it to graph learning, where it yields significant gains. SSL4RL establishes a versatile and effective paradigm for aligning multimodal models using verifiable, self-supervised objectives.

Xiaojun Guo, Runyu Zhou, Yifei Wang, Qi Zhang, Chenheng Zhang, Stefanie Jegelka, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin, Wei Lin, Yisen Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy55.8
951
Link PredictionFB15k-237 (test)--
419
Link PredictionWN18RR (test)--
380
Visual Question AnsweringRealworldQA
Accuracy62.22
259
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy74.37
162
Visual Question AnsweringRealWorldQA (test)
Accuracy70.58
47
Node ClassificationWikiCS (test)
Average Accuracy57.62
35
Visual Question AnsweringBLINK
Accuracy48.18
27
Vision-related Reasoning and PerceptionMMBench (test)
Avg Score80.38
23
Graph ClassificationCora (test)
Accuracy67.7
23
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Follow for update