Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Scaf-GRPO: Scaffolded Group Relative Policy Optimization for Enhancing LLM Reasoning

About

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these methods are fundamentally constrained by the ''learning cliff'' phenomenon: when faced with problems far beyond their current capabilities, models consistently fail, yielding a persistent zero-reward signal. In policy optimization algorithms like GRPO, this collapses the advantage calculation to zero, rendering these difficult problems invisible to the learning gradient and stalling progress. To overcome this, we introduce Scaf-GRPO (Scaffolded Group Relative Policy Optimization), a progressive training framework that strategically provides minimal guidance only when a model's independent learning has plateaued. The framework first diagnoses learning stagnation and then intervenes by injecting tiered in-prompt hints, ranging from abstract concepts to concrete steps, enabling the model to construct a valid solution by itself. Extensive experiments on challenging mathematics benchmarks demonstrate Scaf-GRPO's effectiveness, boosting the pass@1 score of the Qwen2.5-Math-7B model on the AIME24 benchmark by a relative 44.3% over a vanilla GRPO baseline. This result demonstrates our framework provides a robust and effective methodology for unlocking a model's ability to solve problems previously beyond its reach, a critical step towards extending the frontier of autonomous reasoning in LLM.

Xichen Zhang, Sitong Wu, Yinghao Zhu, Haoru Tan, Shaozuo Yu, Ziyi He, Jiaya Jia• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy49.1
214
MathematicsMATH 500
Pass@185.8
122
Mathematical ReasoningGaoKao En 2023
Pass@1 Accuracy72.3
66
Mathematical ReasoningIMO-Bench
Accuracy33.9
57
Mathematical ReasoningMathematical Reasoning Suite (AMC, AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Minerva, MATH, Olympiad) various (test val)
Average Score24.1
55
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2026
AIME 2026 Accuracy54.3
55
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva
pass@1 Mean38.6
54
MathematicsAMC
pass@177.5
53
Mathematical ReasoningCompetition-level Math Benchmarks AIME24, AIME25, AMC23, MATH500, Olympiad, Minerva
AIME 24 Score58.3
52
MathematicsOlympiadBench
Pass@1 Accuracy50.7
51
Showing 10 of 42 rows

Other info

Follow for update