Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgetting

About

Adapting language models (LMs) to new tasks via post-training carries the risk of degrading existing capabilities -- a phenomenon classically known as catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, toward identifying guidelines for mitigating this phenomenon, we systematically compare the forgetting patterns of two widely adopted post-training methods: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL). Our experiments reveal a consistent trend across LM families (Llama, Qwen) and tasks (instruction following, general knowledge, and arithmetic reasoning): RL leads to less forgetting than SFT while achieving comparable or higher target task performance. To investigate the cause for this difference, we consider a simplified setting in which the LM is modeled as a mixture of two distributions, one corresponding to prior knowledge and the other to the target task. We identify that the mode-seeking nature of RL, which stems from its use of on-policy data, enables keeping prior knowledge intact when learning the target task. We then verify this insight by demonstrating that the use on-policy data underlies the robustness of RL to forgetting in practical settings, as opposed to other algorithmic choices such as the KL regularization or advantage estimation. Lastly, as a practical implication, our results highlight the potential of mitigating forgetting using approximately on-policy data, which can be substantially more efficient to obtain than fully on-policy data.

Howard Chen, Noam Razin, Karthik Narasimhan, Danqi Chen• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Instruction FollowingIFEval
IFEval Accuracy52.6
824
Mathematical ReasoningCountdown
Accuracy29
252
CodingHumanEval
Pass@171.3
168
CodingHumanEval+
Pass@164.6
152
CodingMBPP
Accuracy56.9
145
CodingMBPP+
Pass@163.8
117
Instruction FollowingIFEval (test)--
88
CodingMBPP
Pass@1 Accuracy74.1
78
CodingHumanEval
Accuracy57.1
60
Mathematical ReasoningCOUNTDOWN (test)
Accuracy20.9
54
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Follow for update