Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

About

Instrumental variables have been widely used for estimating the causal effect between exposure and outcome. Conventional estimation methods require complete knowledge about all the instruments' validity; a valid instrument must not have a direct effect on the outcome and not be related to unmeasured confounders. Often, this is impractical as highlighted by Mendelian randomization studies where genetic markers are used as instruments and complete knowledge about instruments' validity is equivalent to complete knowledge about the involved genes' functions. In this paper, we propose a method for estimation of causal effects when this complete knowledge is absent. It is shown that causal effects are identified and can be estimated as long as less than $50$% of instruments are invalid, without knowing which of the instruments are invalid. We also introduce conditions for identification when the 50% threshold is violated. A fast penalized $\ell_1$ estimation method, called sisVIVE, is introduced for estimating the causal effect without knowing which instruments are valid, with theoretical guarantees on its performance. The proposed method is demonstrated on simulated data and a real Mendelian randomization study concerning the effect of body mass index on health-related quality of life index. An R package \emph{sisVIVE} is available online.

Hyunseung Kang, Anru Zhang, T. Tony Cai, Dylan S. Small• 2014

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic bi-directional MR data Scenario S(3,3,8) direction Y → X
MSE0.32
42
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic bi-directional MR data Scenario S(4,4,10), direction X → Y
MSE0.318
42
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic bi-directional MR data Scenario S(2,2,6) direction Y → X
MSE0.383
42
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic bi-directional MR data Scenario S(2,2,6) direction X → Y
MSE0.389
24
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic bi-directional MR data Scenario S(4,4,10) direction Y → X
MSE0.304
24
Bi-directional Mendelian RandomizationBi-directional MR simulation data Direction Y->X S(4,4,10) (test)
MSE0.299
18
Bi-directional MR model estimationSynthetic Bi-directional MR Scenario S(2,3,7) Direction X -> Y
MSE0.307
18
Bi-directional Mendelian RandomizationBi-directional MR simulation data Direction X->Y Scenario S(3,3,8) (test)
MSE0.408
18
Bi-directional MR estimation (X -> Y)Synthetic Scenario S(2, 2, 6)
MSE0.398
18
Bi-directional MR estimation (X -> Y)Synthetic Scenario S(3, 3, 8)
MSE0.378
18
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update