Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Distinguishing Cause from Effect Using Quantiles: Bivariate Quantile Causal Discovery

About

Causal inference using observational data is challenging, especially in the bivariate case. Through the minimum description length principle, we link the postulate of independence between the generating mechanisms of the cause and of the effect given the cause to quantile regression. Based on this theory, we develop Bivariate Quantile Causal Discovery (bQCD), a new method to distinguish cause from effect assuming no confounding, selection bias or feedback. Because it uses multiple quantile levels instead of the conditional mean only, bQCD is adaptive not only to additive, but also to multiplicative or even location-scale generating mechanisms. To illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, we perform an extensive empirical comparison on both synthetic and real datasets. This study shows that bQCD is robust across different implementations of the method (i.e., the quantile regression), computationally efficient, and compares favorably to state-of-the-art methods.

Natasa Tagasovska, Val\'erie Chavez-Demoulin, Thibault Vatter• 2018

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Causal DiscoveryTübingen
AUROC73
37
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryAN
Accuracy100
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryLS
Accuracy100
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryTue
Accuracy68
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoverySIM-c
Accuracy77
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryNet
Accuracy81
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoverySIM
Accuracy68
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryPER
Accuracy2
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryD4 s1
Accuracy33
33
Bivariate Causal DiscoveryQd-V
Accuracy34
33
Showing 10 of 45 rows

Other info

Follow for update