Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Low-Rank Matrix Completion

About

We consider the problem of uncertainty quantification for an unknown low-rank matrix $\mathbf{X}$, given a partial and noisy observation of its entries. This quantification of uncertainty is essential for many real-world problems, including image processing, satellite imaging, and seismology, providing a principled framework for validating scientific conclusions and guiding decision-making. However, existing literature has mainly focused on the completion (i.e., point estimation) of the matrix $\mathbf{X}$, with little work on investigating its uncertainty. To this end, we propose in this work a new Bayesian modeling framework, called BayeSMG, which parametrizes the unknown $\mathbf{X}$ via its underlying row and column subspaces. This Bayesian subspace parametrization enables efficient posterior inference on matrix subspaces, which represents interpretable phenomena in many applications. This can then be leveraged for improved matrix recovery. We demonstrate the effectiveness of BayeSMG over existing Bayesian matrix recovery methods in numerical experiments, image inpainting, and a seismic sensor network application.

Henry Shaowu Yuchi, Simon Mak, Yao Xie• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Matrix GenerationSolar few-sample (n=300) pmiss=0%
Singular Value Discrepancy0.0321
14
Density EstimationSolar 0% p_miss Few-sample (n=300)
MMD0.219
14
Density EstimationSolar Few-sample (n=300) (20% p_miss)
MMD0.265
11
Matrix GenerationSolar few-sample (n=300) (pmiss=20%)
Average Singular-Value Discrepancy0.045
11
Generative ModelingCrosshatch 20% missing-entry rate
Mean Entry Difference (x10^-2)0.0728
10
Generative ModelingWaves 20% missing-entry rate
Mean Absolute Entry Difference14.8
10
Density EstimationSolar Few-sample (n=300) (40% p_miss)
MMD0.293
8
Distribution MatchingBands pmiss 0%
Frob Mean Diff14.2
5
Distribution MatchingBands pmiss 20%
Frob Mean Diff16.3
5
Distribution MatchingBands pmiss 40%
Frob Mean Diff19.9
5
Showing 10 of 53 rows

Other info

Follow for update