Regression Discontinuity Designs
About
The Regression Discontinuity (RD) design is one of the most widely used non-experimental methods for causal inference and program evaluation. Over the last two decades, statistical and econometric methods for RD analysis have expanded and matured, and there is now a large number of methodological results for RD identification, estimation, inference, and validation. We offer a curated review of this methodological literature organized around the two most popular frameworks for the analysis and interpretation of RD designs: the continuity framework and the local randomization framework. For each framework, we discuss three main topics: (i) designs and parameters, which focuses on different types of RD settings and treatment effects of interest; (ii) estimation and inference, which presents the most popular methods based on local polynomial regression and analysis of experiments, as well as refinements, extensions, and alternatives; and (iii) validation and falsification, which summarizes an array of mostly empirical approaches to support the validity of RD designs in practice.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Effect Estimation | ACIC semi-synthetic 2016 (test) | Mean Error0.0015 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | ACIC semi-synthetic 2017 | Mean TEE Error0.0028 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | RORCO semi-synthetic | MSE0.0046 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | JOBS semi-synthetic (test) | MSE0.0033 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | NEWS semi-synthetic (test) | MSE0.0023 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | NEWS semi-synthetic | Mean Error0.0023 | 22 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | RORCO Real | Mean Error0.154 | 22 | |
| Causal Inference | IHDP | MSE2.26 | 20 | |
| Treatment Effect Estimation | TWINS | Mean Effect4.27e-5 | 15 |