Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Distributionally Robust Receive Combining

About

This article investigates signal estimation in wireless transmission (i.e., receive combining) from the perspective of statistical machine learning, where the transmit signals may be from an integrated sensing and communication system; that is, 1) signals may be not only discrete constellation points but also arbitrary complex values; 2) signals may be spatially correlated. Particular attention is paid to handling various uncertainties such as the uncertainty of the transmit signal covariance, the uncertainty of the channel matrix, the uncertainty of the channel noise covariance, the existence of channel impulse noises, the non-ideality of the power amplifiers, and the limited sample size of pilots. To proceed, a distributionally robust receive combining framework that is insensitive to the above uncertainties is proposed, which reveals that channel estimation is not a necessary operation. For optimal linear estimation, the proposed framework includes several existing combiners as special cases such as diagonal loading and eigenvalue thresholding. For optimal nonlinear estimation, estimators are limited in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and neural network function spaces, and corresponding uncertainty-aware solutions (e.g., kernelized diagonal loading) are derived. In addition, we prove that the ridge and kernel ridge regression methods in machine learning are distributionally robust against diagonal perturbation in feature covariance.

Shixiong Wang, Wei Dai, Geoffrey Ye Li• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy82.8
1165
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy64.9
1117
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy60.6
1043
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy86.5
935
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score1.58e+3
557
Visual Question AnsweringChartQA
Accuracy62.2
239
Visual Question AnsweringScienceQA
Accuracy73.6
210
Diagram Question AnsweringAI2D
AI2D Accuracy66.6
196
Multimodal Model EvaluationMMBench
Accuracy67.4
180
Visual Question AnsweringVQAv2
Accuracy81.8
177
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update