Noise Aggregation Analysis Driven by Small-Noise Injection: Efficient Membership Inference for Diffusion Models
About
Diffusion models have demonstrated powerful performance in generating high-quality images. A typical example is text-to-image generator like Stable Diffusion. However, their widespread use also poses potential privacy risks. A key concern is membership inference attacks, which attempt to determine whether a particular data sample was used in the model training process. Existing membership inference attacks against diffusion models either directly exploit sample loss differences or rely on image-level reconstruction differences. Both approaches commonly ignore the consistency characteristics of noise prediction during the diffusion process, resulting in either low inference accuracy or high computational costs. To address these shortcomings, we propose a membership inference method based on noise aggregation analysis, and introduce a single-step, low-intensity noise injection diffusion strategy to amplify differences between member and non-member samples. Our proposed approach substantially reduces model query requirements while delivering more efficient and accurate membership inference.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Membership Inference Attack | CIFAR-100 | TPR @ 1% FPR9.65 | 46 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | Stable Diffusion V1.4 | ASR70.1 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | Stable Diffusion v1.5 | ASR69.6 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | CIFAR-10 | TPR @ 1% FPR28.7 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | Tiny-ImageNet | TPR @ 1% FPR14.58 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | CIFAR-10 50% (test) | Attack Success Rate (ASR)90.1 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | CIFAR-100 50% (test) | Attack Success Rate (ASR)83.9 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | Tiny-ImageNet 50% (test) | Attack Success Rate (ASR)84.2 | 4 | |
| Membership Inference Attack | Average CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny-IN | ASR86.1 | 4 |