Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

USF-MAE: Ultrasound Self-Supervised Foundation Model with Masked Autoencoding

About

Ultrasound imaging is one of the most widely used diagnostic modalities, offering real-time, radiation-free assessment across diverse clinical domains. However, interpretation of ultrasound images remains challenging due to high noise levels, operator dependence, and limited field of view, resulting in substantial inter-observer variability. Current Deep Learning approaches are hindered by the scarcity of large labeled datasets and the domain gap between general and sonographic images, which limits the transferability of models pretrained on non-medical data. To address these challenges, we introduce the Ultrasound Self-Supervised Foundation Model with Masked Autoencoding (USF-MAE), the first large-scale self-supervised MAE framework pretrained exclusively on ultrasound data. The model was pre-trained on 370,000 2D and 3D ultrasound images curated from 46 open-source datasets, collectively termed OpenUS-46, spanning over twenty anatomical regions. This curated dataset has been made publicly available to facilitate further research and reproducibility. Using a Vision Transformer encoder-decoder architecture, USF-MAE reconstructs masked image patches, enabling it to learn rich, modality-specific representations directly from unlabeled data. The pretrained encoder was fine-tuned on three public downstream classification benchmarks: BUS-BRA (breast cancer), MMOTU-2D (ovarian tumors), and GIST514-DB (gastrointestinal stromal tumors). Across all tasks, USF-MAE consistently outperformed conventional CNN and ViT baselines, achieving F1-scores of 81.6%, 79.6%, and 82.4%, respectively. Despite not using labels during pretraining, USF-MAE approached the performance of the supervised foundation model UltraSam on breast cancer classification and surpassed it on the other tasks, demonstrating strong cross-anatomical generalization.

Youssef Megahed, Robin Ducharme, Aylin Erman, Mark Walker, Steven Hawken, Adrian D. C. Chan• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Ultrasound Image ClassificationPOCUS (test)
Macro F190.1
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationBUTTERFLY (test)
Macro F191.1
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationAUL (test)
Macro F10.581
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationGBCU (test)
Macro F145.9
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationMMOTU (test)
Macro F128.7
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationTN5000 (test)
Macro F1 Score56.3
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationBUSBRA (test)
Macro F162.9
10
Ultrasound Image ClassificationFATTY LIV. (test)
Macro F142.1
10
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update