Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Towards Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models by Refining Textual Embeddings

About

Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) remain a persistent challenge, often stemming from inadequate integration of visual information during multimodal reasoning. A key cause is the model's over-reliance on textual priors and underutilization of visual cues, leading to outputs that are linguistically fluent but visually inaccurate. For example, given an image of an empty kitchen countertop, an LVLM might hallucinate a "bowl of fruit" or "cup of coffee", relying on language associations rather than visual evidence. Most LVLMs incorporate visual features by appending them to the input stream of a pre-trained LLM and training on large-scale vision-language datasets. Our systematic analysis reveals that this strategy often leads to over-dependence on textual information due to the inherent bias of LLMs towards language-dominant representations. This imbalance skews attention towards the text over visual content, weakening the model's ability to ground outputs in visual inputs. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective visual feature incorporation method that encourages the model to learn visually-informed textual embeddings distinct from those of the base LLM and promotes a more balanced attention distribution. Experimental results across multiple hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucinations and fosters more balanced multimodal reasoning. Notably, our approach achieves substantial gains, including +9.33% on MMVP-MLLM, +2.99% on POPE-AOKVQA, up to +3.4% on Merlin, and +3% on the hard-data split of HallusionBench.

Aakriti Agrawal, Gouthaman KV, Rohith Aralikatti, Gauri Jagatap, Jiaxin Yuan, Sarvesh Baskar, Vijay Kamarshi, Andrea Fanelli, Furong Huang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination DetectionPOPE-AOKVQA
Accuracy58.8
4
Action Hallucination DetectionMementos Robotics Domain (test)
Accuracy6.5
2
Fine-grained visual discriminationMMVP-MLLM
Accuracy23.33
2
Object Existence VerificationMerlin Curated Images
Positive Original Accuracy34.3
2
Object Existence VerificationMerlin Images (random)
Pos-Orig Score48.6
2
Object Hallucination DetectionMementos Robotics Domain (test)
Accuracy9.4
2
Object Hallucination DetectionMementos Daily Life Domain (test)
Accuracy22.18
2
Object Hallucination DetectionMementos Comics Domain (test)
Accuracy12
2
Object-level hallucination evaluationPOPE A-OKVQA Adversarial SEEM
Accuracy57.09
2
Action Hallucination DetectionMementos Daily Life Domain (test)
Accuracy12.31
2
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update