SAD-Flower: Flow Matching for Safe, Admissible, and Dynamically Consistent Planning
About
Flow matching (FM) has shown promising results in data-driven planning. However, it inherently lacks formal guarantees for ensuring state and action constraints, whose satisfaction is a fundamental and crucial requirement for the safety and admissibility of planned trajectories on various systems. Moreover, existing FM planners do not ensure the dynamical consistency, which potentially renders trajectories inexecutable. We address these shortcomings by proposing SAD-Flower, a novel framework for generating Safe, Admissible, and Dynamically consistent trajectories. Our approach relies on an augmentation of the flow with a virtual control input. Thereby, principled guidance can be derived using techniques from nonlinear control theory, providing formal guarantees for state constraints, action constraints, and dynamic consistency. Crucially, SAD-Flower operates without retraining, enabling test-time satisfaction of unseen constraints. Through extensive experiments across several tasks, we demonstrate that SAD-Flower outperforms various generative-model-based baselines in ensuring constraint satisfaction.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexterous Manipulation | D4RL Adroit Relocate (offline) | Safety Score0.00e+0 | 9 | |
| Locomotion | Hopper Med-Expert | Safety0.00e+0 | 7 | |
| Locomotion Planning | walker2d medium | Safety0.00e+0 | 7 | |
| Manipulation | KUKA Block Stacking | Computation Time (sec)0.74 | 7 | |
| Locomotion | Hopper Med-Expert | Computation Time (sec)0.14 | 7 | |
| Locomotion | hopper medium | Computation Time (sec)0.13 | 7 | |
| Locomotion | Walker2D Med-Expert | Computation Time (sec)0.15 | 7 | |
| Locomotion | walker2d medium | Computation Time (sec)0.14 | 7 | |
| Locomotion Planning | hopper medium | Safety0.00e+0 | 7 | |
| Manipulation | KUKA Block Stacking | Safety Compliance0.00e+0 | 7 |