Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

About

Large language models often respond to ambiguous requests by implicitly committing to one interpretation. Intent misunderstandings can frustrate users and create safety risks. To address this, we propose generating multiple interpretation-answer pairs in a single structured response to ambiguous requests. Our models are trained with reinforcement learning and customized reward functions using multiple valid answers as supervision. Experiments on conversational question answering and semantic parsing demonstrate that our method achieves higher coverage of valid answers than baseline approaches. Human evaluation confirms that predicted interpretations are highly aligned with their answers. Our approach promotes transparency with explicit interpretations, achieves efficiency by requiring only one generation step, and supports downstream applications through its structured output format.

Irina Saparina, Mirella Lapata• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Text-to-SQL ParsingAmbrosia Ambiguous subset (test)
Recall82.4
11
Text-to-SQL ParsingAmbrosia Unambiguous (test)
Recall88.7
11
Conversational Question AnsweringAbg-CoQA Ambiguous
Overlap F172.9
10
Conversational Question AnsweringAbg-CoQA Unambiguous
Overlap F184.4
10
Semantic SimilarityAbg-CoQA
Similarity83
2
Text-to-SQL ambiguity resolutionAmbrosia Ambiguous
Recall82.4
2
Text-to-SQL ambiguity resolutionAmbiQT
Recall66.9
2
Interpretation AlignmentAbg-CoQA (sampled 30 ambiguous examples)
Alignment90
1
Interpretation AlignmentAmbrosia sampled 30 ambiguous examples
Alignment Score0.917
1
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update