Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Pillar-0: A New Frontier for Radiology Foundation Models

About

Radiology plays an integral role in modern medicine, yet rising imaging volumes have far outpaced workforce growth. Foundation models offer a path toward assisting with the full spectrum of radiology tasks, but existing medical models remain limited: they process volumetric CT and MRI as low-fidelity 2D slices, discard critical grayscale contrast information, and lack evaluation frameworks that reflect real clinical practice. We introduce Pillar-0, a radiology foundation model pretrained on 42,990 abdomen-pelvis CTs, 86,411 chest CTs, 14,348 head CTs, and 11,543 breast MRIs from a large academic center, together with RATE, a scalable framework that extracts structured labels for 366 radiologic findings with near-perfect accuracy using LLMs. Across internal test sets of 14,230 abdomen-pelvis CTs, 10,646 chest CTs, 4,906 head CTs, and 1,585 breast MRIs, Pillar-0 establishes a new performance frontier, achieving mean AUROCs of 86.4, 88.0, 90.1, and 82.9, outperforming MedGemma (Google), MedImageInsight (Microsoft), Lingshu (Alibaba), and Merlin (Stanford) by 7.8-15.8 AUROC points and ranking best in 87.2\% (319/366) tasks. Pillar-0 similarly outperforms all baselines in an external validation on the Stanford Abdominal CT dataset, including Merlin (82.2 vs 80.6 AUROC). Pillar-0 extends to tasks beyond its pretraining, such as long-horizon lung cancer risk prediction, where it improves upon the state-of-the-art Sybil by 3.0 C-index points on NLST, and generalizes with gains of 5.9 (MGH) and 1.9 (CGMH). In brain hemorrhage detection, Pillar-0 obtained a >95 AUROC when using only 1/20th of the data of the next most sample efficient baseline. Pillar-0 and RATE together provide an open, clinically rigorous foundation for building high-performance radiology systems, enabling applications that were previously infeasible due to computational, data, and evaluation constraints.

Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Longchao Liu, Long Lian, Michael Nercessian, Natalia Harguindeguy, Yufu Wu, Peter Mikhael, Gigin Lin, Lecia V. Sequist, Florian Fintelmann, Trevor Darrell, Yutong Bai, Maggie Chung, Adam Yala• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Disease ClassificationCT-RATE (test)
AUC84.27
16
Zero-shot ClassificationEXT-Abd-CT
AUROC76.35
13
Image-to-Text RetrievalMerlin-Abd-CT
Recall@148.9
13
Text-to-Image RetrievalMerlin-Abd-CT
Recall@147.69
13
Zero-shot ClassificationCT-RATE
AUROC78.6
13
Zero-shot ClassificationEXT-Chest-CT
AUROC79.12
13
Zero-shot ClassificationMerlin-Abd-CT
AUROC (Zero-shot)81.58
13
Image-to-Text RetrievalChest CT-RATE
Recall@112.07
13
Text-to-Image RetrievalChest CT-RATE
Recall@110.43
13
Abnormality DetectionEXT-Abd-CT
AUROC76.07
12
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Follow for update