Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokens

About

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at reasoning in linguistic space but struggle with perceptual understanding that requires dense visual perception, e.g., spatial reasoning and geometric awareness. This limitation stems from the fact that current VLMs have limited mechanisms to capture dense visual information across spatial dimensions. We introduce Chain-of-Visual-Thought (COVT), a framework that enables VLMs to reason not only in words but also through continuous visual tokens-compact latent representations that encode rich perceptual cues. Within a small budget of roughly 20 tokens, COVT distills knowledge from lightweight vision experts, capturing complementary properties such as 2D appearance, 3D geometry, spatial layout, and edge structure. During training, the VLM with COVT autoregressively predicts these visual tokens to reconstruct dense supervision signals (e.g., depth, segmentation, edges, and DINO features). At inference, the model reasons directly in the continuous visual token space, preserving efficiency while optionally decoding dense predictions for interpretability. Evaluated across more than ten diverse perception benchmarks, including CV-Bench, MMVP, RealWorldQA, MMStar, WorldMedQA, and HRBench, integrating COVT into strong VLMs such as Qwen2.5-VL and LLaVA consistently improves performance by 3% to 16% and demonstrates that compact continuous visual thinking enables more precise, grounded, and interpretable multimodal intelligence.

Yiming Qin, Bomin Wei, Jiaxin Ge, Konstantinos Kallidromitis, Stephanie Fu, Trevor Darrell, XuDong Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy84.6
132
Real-world Visual Question AnsweringRealworldQA
Accuracy71.6
91
Visual ReasoningVision-Centric Benchmarks
BLINK Score56
20
PerceptionMMStar (test)
Accuracy69.2
11
PerceptionCVBench (test)
Accuracy80
11
PerceptionBLINK (test)
Accuracy0.56
11
PerceptionMMVP (test)
Accuracy58.7
11
PerceptionV* (test)
Accuracy78
11
multi-view Visual Question AnsweringVSI-Bench (test)
Average Score18.6
11
High-resolution Image ComprehensionHRBench
HRBench 4K Score0.71
9
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update