Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokens

About

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at reasoning in linguistic space but struggle with perceptual understanding that requires dense visual perception, e.g., spatial reasoning and geometric awareness. This limitation stems from the fact that current VLMs have limited mechanisms to capture dense visual information across spatial dimensions. We introduce Chain-of-Visual-Thought (COVT), a framework that enables VLMs to reason not only in words but also through continuous visual tokens-compact latent representations that encode rich perceptual cues. Within a small budget of roughly 20 tokens, COVT distills knowledge from lightweight vision experts, capturing complementary properties such as 2D appearance, 3D geometry, spatial layout, and edge structure. During training, the VLM with COVT autoregressively predicts these visual tokens to reconstruct dense supervision signals (e.g., depth, segmentation, edges, and DINO features). At inference, the model reasons directly in the continuous visual token space, preserving efficiency while optionally decoding dense predictions for interpretability. Evaluated across more than ten diverse perception benchmarks, including CV-Bench, MMVP, RealWorldQA, MMStar, WorldMedQA, and HRBench, integrating COVT into strong VLMs such as Qwen2.5-VL and LLaVA consistently improves performance by 3% to 16% and demonstrates that compact continuous visual thinking enables more precise, grounded, and interpretable multimodal intelligence.

Yiming Qin, Bomin Wei, Jiaxin Ge, Konstantinos Kallidromitis, Stephanie Fu, Trevor Darrell, XuDong Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy84.6
153
Real-world Visual Question AnsweringRealworldQA
Accuracy71.6
140
High-Resolution Visual PerceptionHR-Bench-4K
Accuracy71
40
Visual ReasoningV*
Overall Score78
22
Fine-grained Visual PerceptionHRBench-8K
Accuracy68.6
21
Fine-grained Visual PerceptionV-Star
Accuracy77.5
20
Visual ReasoningVision-Centric Benchmarks
BLINK Score56
20
PerceptionMMStar (test)
Accuracy69.2
11
PerceptionCVBench (test)
Accuracy80
11
PerceptionBLINK (test)
Accuracy0.56
11
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update