Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Aligning LLMs with Biomedical Knowledge using Balanced Fine-Tuning

About

Engineering LLMs to accelerate life sciences research requires a robust alignment with biomedical knowledge. We observe that biomedical text exhibits a fundamentally different uncertainty structure from general text: dense low-confidence runs encode epistemic knowledge gaps (dense causal chains, rare entities) rather than the sparse aleatoric stylistic variation typical of general text. Based on this discovery, we propose Balanced Fine-Tuning (BFT), a dual-scale post-training method that combines group-normalized token reweighting with sequence-level reallocation toward knowledge-dense samples exhibiting dense epistemic uncertainty. Across medical evaluation, biological reasoning, sparse-reward RL, and biological representation tasks, BFT provides more consistent gains than SFT and DFT under a shared training setup. When replacing the default closed-source backbones in GeneAgent (GPT-4o) and VCWorld (Gemini-2.5-Flash), the BFT-aligned 70B model delivers stronger performance across biological process reasoning and chemical perturbation prediction. Critically, all BFT variants further improve after subsequent GRPO with sparse rewards, while SFT and DFT degrade, suggesting that epistemic-aware post-training provides a more robust policy initialization. Beyond text generation, BFT-aligned LLMs produce more accurate and professional biomedical profile texts; after encoding these profiles with a text embedding model, the resulting representations support gene-level, cell-level, and perturbation-response tasks, suggesting that BFT-enhanced generation can facilitate biological representation and, in turn, broader biomedical downstream tasks.

Zhenchao Tang, Fang Wang, Haohuai He, Jiale Zhou, Tianxu Lv, Jun Zhu, Shouzhi Chen, Minghao Yang, Yu Wang, Jiayang Wu, Yidong Song, Yaokun Li, Jiehui Huang, Bing He, Jianhua Yao• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Cell-level clusteringPhenotype labels
ARI16
9
Cell-level clusteringCell Type labels
ARI33
9
Gene-Gene Interaction predictionGGI
AUC82.7
8
Gene-level biological representation evaluationTF Range
AUC62.6
8
Gene-level biological representation evaluationDosage
AUC91.1
8
Gene-level biological representation evaluationNo-methy
AUC92.9
8
Protein-Protein Interaction predictionPPI
AUC76.6
8
Gene-level biological representation evaluationLys4
AUC90.7
8
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update