Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Physics-Embedded Gaussian Process for Traffic State Estimation

About

Traffic state estimation (TSE) becomes challenging when probe-vehicle penetration is low and observations are spatially sparse. Pure data-driven methods lack physical explanations and have poor generalization when observed data is sparse. In contrast, physical models have difficulty integrating uncertainties and capturing the real complexity of traffic. To bridge this gap, recent studies have explored combining them by embedding physical structure into Gaussian process. These approaches typically introduce the governing equations as soft constraints through pseudo-observations, enabling the integration of model structure within a variational framework. However, these methods rely heavily on penalty tuning and lack principled uncertainty calibration, which makes them sensitive to model mis-specification. In this work, we address these limitations by presenting a novel Physics-Embedded Gaussian Process (PEGP), designed to integrate domain knowledge with data-driven methods in traffic state estimation. Specifically, we design two multi-output kernels informed by classic traffic flow models, constructed via the explicit application of the linearized differential operator. Experiments on HighD, NGSIM show consistent improvements over non-physics baselines. PEGP-ARZ proves more reliable under sparse observation, while PEGP-LWR achieves lower errors with denser observation. Ablation study further reveals that PEGP-ARZ residuals align closely with physics and yield calibrated, interpretable uncertainty, whereas PEGP-LWR residuals are more orthogonal and produce nearly constant variance fields. This PEGP framework combines physical priors, uncertainty quantification, which can provide reliable support for TSE.

Yanlin Chen, Kehua Chen, Yinhai Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Density ReconstructionHighD
MAE1.44
24
Speed ReconstructionHighD
MAE0.38
24
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 3% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE6.92
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 5% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE4.86
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 10% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE4.01
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 20% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE3.47
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 30% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE3.37
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM 40% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE3.2
4
Density ReconstructionNGSIM Four-Loop Detector
MAE (veh/m)5.01
4
Speed ReconstructionNGSIM 5% Penetration Rate (test)
MAE4.05
4
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update