LDLT $\mathcal{L}$-Lipschitz Network: Generalized Deep End-To-End Lipschitz Network Construction
About
Deep residual networks (ResNets) have demonstrated outstanding success in computer vision tasks, attributed to their ability to maintain gradient flow through deep architectures. Simultaneously, controlling the Lipschitz constant in neural networks has emerged as an essential area of research to enhance adversarial robustness and network certifiability. This paper presents a rigorous approach to the general design of $\mathcal{L}$-Lipschitz deep residual networks using a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) framework. Initially, the ResNet architecture was reformulated as a cyclic tridiagonal LMI, and closed-form constraints on network parameters were derived to ensure $\mathcal{L}$-Lipschitz continuity; however, using a new $LDL^\top$ decomposition approach for certifying LMI feasibility, we extend the construction of $\mathcal{L}$-Lipchitz networks to any other nonlinear architecture. Our contributions include a provable parameterization methodology for constructing Lipschitz-constrained residual networks and other hierarchical architectures. Cholesky decomposition is also used for efficient parameterization. These findings enable robust network designs applicable to adversarial robustness, certified training, and control systems. The $LDL^\top$ formulation is shown to be a tight relaxation of the SDP-based network, maintaining full expressiveness and achieving 3\%-13\% accuracy gains over SLL Layers on 121 UCI data sets.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Accuracy | 121 benchmarks tasks | Wins A94 | 15 | |
| Certified Accuracy | Mean Certified Accuracy (72/255) (test) | Wins A83 | 15 | |
| Certified Robustness | Mean Certified Accuracy 36/255 | Wins A81 | 15 | |
| Certified Robustness | Mean Certified Accuracy 108/255 | Wins A83 | 15 | |
| Certified Accuracy | Mean Certified Accuracy 255/255 | Total Samples (N)121 | 15 | |
| Classification | 121 UCI data sets mean across | Accuracy72.23 | 6 | |
| Classification | 121 UCI data sets | Average Rank2.434 | 6 | |
| Certified Accuracy | UCI radius 255/255 overall comparison | Average Rank2.55 | 6 | |
| Mean Certified Accuracy | UCI data sets (test) | Average Rank2.715 | 6 | |
| Mean Certified Accuracy | UCI 108/255 radius (test) | Average Rank2.562 | 6 |