Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CFO: Learning Continuous-Time PDE Dynamics via Flow-Matched Neural Operators

About

Neural operator surrogates for time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) conventionally employ autoregressive prediction schemes, which accumulate error over long rollouts and require uniform temporal discretization. We introduce the Continuous Flow Operator (CFO), a framework that learns continuous-time PDE dynamics without the computational burden of standard continuous approaches, e.g., neural ODE. The key insight is repurposing flow matching to directly learn the right-hand side of PDEs without backpropagating through ODE solvers. CFO fits temporal splines to trajectory data, using finite-difference estimates of time derivatives at knots to construct probability paths whose velocities closely approximate the true PDE dynamics. A neural operator is then trained via flow matching to predict these analytic velocity fields. This approach is inherently time-resolution invariant: training accepts trajectories sampled on arbitrary, non-uniform time grids while inference queries solutions at any temporal resolution through ODE integration. Across four benchmarks (Lorenz, 1D Burgers, 2D diffusion-reaction, 2D shallow water), CFO demonstrates superior long-horizon stability and remarkable data efficiency. CFO trained on only 25% of irregularly subsampled time points outperforms autoregressive baselines trained on complete data, with relative error reductions up to 87%. Despite requiring numerical integration at inference, CFO achieves competitive efficiency, outperforming autoregressive baselines using only 50% of their function evaluations, while uniquely enabling reverse-time inference and arbitrary temporal querying.

Xianglong Hou, Xinquan Huang, Paris Perdikaris• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Solving PDEBurgers
Relative Error0.8
24
Forward PDE solvingNavier-Stokes
Relative L2 Error0.88
15
Forward PDE solving1D Burgers' equation standard synthetic (test)
Relative L2 Error0.008
10
Forward PDE solvingHYCOM
Relative L2 Error32.75
10
Inverse PDE solvingDarcy
Relative L2 Error17.07
10
Equation Modeling1D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (KS)
Relative L2 Error0.105
3
Learning Dynamical SystemsLorenz
Relative L2 Error0.0453
2
Learning PDE DynamicsBurgers
Relative L2 Error0.0059
2
Learning PDE DynamicsDR
Relative L2 Error0.044
2
Learning PDE DynamicsSWE
Relative L2 Error0.005
2
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update