Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

On the Collapse of Generative Paths: A Criterion and Correction for Diffusion Steering

About

Inference-time steering adapts pretrained diffusion and flow models to new tasks without retraining, often utilizing ratio-of-densities constructions that reweight time-indexed marginals with fixed exponents. We identify Marginal Path Collapse, a failure mode in which the intermediate density defined by such compositions becomes non-normalizable despite valid endpoints. This collapse can arise when composing heterogeneous experts trained with mismatched noise schedules (and/or negative exponents / partial supports). To address this, we provide (i) a sharp sufficient Path Existence Criterion that characterizes when the composed intermediate densities are mathematically well-defined, and (ii) Adaptive Path Correction with Exponents (ACE), which generalizes Feynman-Kac steering to support time-varying exponents. Our analysis reveals that ACE controls the quantile radius of the intermediate distributions, providing a theoretical mechanism for path stabilization observed in experiments. On flexible-pose scaffold decoration, a drug design task composed of de-novo, conformer, and protein-conditioned experts, ACE prevents collapse and significantly outperforms constant-exponent baselines. Furthermore, ACE improves attribute success rates in compositional image generation, establishing it as a general framework for compositional sampling. Project Page: https://ziseoklee.github.io/projects/ACE/

Ziseok Lee, Minyeong Hwang, Wooyeol Lee, Sanghyun Jo, Jihyung Ko, Young Bin Park, Jae-Mun Choi, Eunho Yang, Kyungsu Kim• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Scaffold decorationCrossDock Weak
Validity (%)100
20
Scaffold decorationCrossDock-SBDD
Validity100
20
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG L2
Instance Attr Success Ratio46.25
14
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG L3
Instance Attribute Success Ratio42.5
14
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG L4
Instance Attribute Success Ratio41.72
14
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG L5
Instance Attribute Success Ratio38.38
14
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG L6
Instance Attribute Success Ratio0.349
14
Compositional Image GenerationCOCO-MIG Avg
Instance Attribute Success Ratio40.46
14
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update