Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

CORE: Contrastive Masked Feature Reconstruction on Graphs

About

In the rapidly evolving field of self-supervised learning on graphs, generative and contrastive methodologies have emerged as two dominant approaches. Our study focuses on masked feature reconstruction (MFR), a generative technique where a model learns to restore the raw features of masked nodes in a self-supervised manner. We observe that both MFR and graph contrastive learning (GCL) aim to maximize agreement between similar elements. Building on this observation, we reveal a novel theoretical insight: under specific conditions, the objectives of MFR and node-level GCL converge, despite their distinct operational mechanisms. This theoretical connection suggests these approaches are complementary rather than fundamentally different, prompting us to explore their integration to enhance self-supervised learning on graphs. Our research presents Contrastive Masked Feature Reconstruction (CORE), a novel graph self-supervised learning framework that integrates contrastive learning into MFR. Specifically, we form positive pairs exclusively between the original and reconstructed features of masked nodes, encouraging the encoder to prioritize contextual information over the node's own features. Additionally, we leverage the masked nodes themselves as negative samples, combining MFR's reconstructive power with GCL's discriminative ability to better capture intrinsic graph structures. Empirically, our proposed framework CORE significantly outperforms MFR across node and graph classification tasks, demonstrating state-of-the-art results. In particular, CORE surpasses GraphMAE and GraphMAE2 by up to 2.80% and 3.72% on node classification tasks, and by up to 3.82% and 3.76% on graph classification tasks.

Jianyuan Bo, Yuan Fang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy84.2
885
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy77.1
742
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy90.1
697
Graph ClassificationNCI1
Accuracy83.2
460
Graph ClassificationCOLLAB
Accuracy84.3
329
Graph ClassificationIMDB-B
Accuracy76.7
322
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy81.3
307
Graph ClassificationIMDB-M
Accuracy53
218
Node ClassificationwikiCS
Accuracy80.2
198
Node ClassificationPhoto
Mean Accuracy93.9
165
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update