Field evaluation and optimization of a lightweight autonomous lidar-based UAV system based on a rigorous experimental setup in boreal forest environments
About
Interest in utilizing autonomous uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) for under-canopy forest remote sensing has increased in recent years, resulting in the publication of numerous autonomous flight algorithms in the scientific literature. To support the selection and development of such algorithms, a reliable comparison of existing approaches based on published studies is essential. However, reliable comparisons are currently challenging due to widely varying experimental setups and incomplete reporting practices. This study proposes a standardized experimental setup for evaluating autonomous under-canopy UAV systems to fill this gap. The proposed setup emphasizes quantitative reporting of forest complexity, visual representation of test environments, execution of multiple repeated flights, and reporting of flight success rates alongside qualitative flight results. In addition, flights at multiple target speeds are encouraged, with reporting of realized flight speed, mission completion time, and point-to-point flight distance. The proposed setup is demonstrated using a lightweight lidar-based quadrotor employing state-of-the-art open-source algorithms, evaluated through extensive experiments in two natural boreal forest environments. Based on a systematic evaluation of the original system, several improvements were introduced. The same experimental protocol was then repeated with the optimized system, resulting in a total of 93 real-world flights. The optimized system achieved success rates of 12/15 and 15/15 at target flight speeds of 1 m/s and 2 m/s, respectively, in a medium-difficulty forest, and 12/15 and 5/15 in a difficult forest. Adoption of the proposed experimental setup would facilitate the literature-based comparison of autonomous under-canopy flight systems and support systematic performance improvement of future UAV-based forest robotics solutions.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous UAV Flight | Medium Forest | Total Collisions2 | 4 | |
| Autonomous UAV Flight | Difficult Forest | Total Collisions2 | 3 | |
| Autonomous Navigation | RW Baseline Difficult Forest 1.0 | Distance (m)57 | 2 | |
| Autonomous Navigation | RW-2 Medium Forest 1.0 | Distance (m)57 | 2 |