Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Dual-Density Inference for Efficient Language Model Reasoning

About

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, current approaches employ uniform language density for both intermediate reasoning and final answers, leading to computational inefficiency. Our observation found that reasoning process serves a computational function for the model itself, while answering serves a communicative function for human understanding. This distinction enables the use of compressed, symbol-rich language for intermediate computations while maintaining human-readable final explanations. To address this inefficiency, we present Denser: \underline{D}ual-d\underline{ens}ity inf\underline{er}ence, a novel framework that optimizes information density separately for reasoning and answering phases. Our framework implements this through three components: a query processing module that analyzes input problems, a high-density compressed reasoning mechanism for efficient intermediate computations, and an answer generation component that translates compressed reasoning into human-readable solutions. Experimental evaluation across multiple reasoning question answering benchmarks demonstrates that Denser reduces token consumption by up to 62\% compared to standard Chain-of-Thought methods while preserving or improving accuracy. These efficiency gains are particularly significant for complex multi-step reasoning problems where traditional methods generate extensive explanations.

Zhengyi Zhao, Shubo Zhang, Yuxi Zhang, Huimin Wang, Binyang Li, Kam-Fai Wong• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy93.5
983
Mathematical ReasoningMATH
Accuracy58.2
643
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy88.2
351
General KnowledgeMMLU
MMLU General Knowledge Accuracy87.8
170
General ReasoningMMLU
MMLU Accuracy88.7
126
General ReasoningStratQA
Accuracy87.1
91
Code GenerationMBPP
Accuracy74.3
90
Math ReasoningMATH
Accuracy57.6
88
Logical reasoningLogiQA
Accuracy79.1
84
Logical reasoningProofW
Accuracy83.7
80
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update