More Consistent Accuracy PINN via Alternating Easy-Hard Training
About
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a prominent paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their training strategies remain underexplored. While hard prioritization methods inspired by finite element methods are widely adopted, recent research suggests that easy prioritization can also be effective. Nevertheless, we find that both approaches exhibit notable trade-offs and inconsistent performance across PDE types. To address this issue, we develop a hybrid strategy that combines the strengths of hard and easy prioritization through an alternating training algorithm. On PDEs with steep gradients, nonlinearity, and high dimensionality, the proposed method achieves consistently high accuracy, with relative L2 errors mostly in the range of O(10^-5) to O(10^-6), significantly surpassing baseline methods. Moreover, it offers greater reliability across diverse problems, whereas compared approaches often suffer from variable accuracy depending on the PDE. This work provides new insights into designing hybrid training strategies to enhance the performance and robustness of PINNs.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDE solving | Helmholtz equation | Relative L2 Error0.006 | 32 | |
| Heat Conduction Equation Solving | Heat conduction problem | Relative L2 Error1.05e-5 | 6 | |
| Partial Differential Equation Solving | 4D multiscale equation | Relative L2 Error5.59e-5 | 6 | |
| PDE solving | Sine-Gordon equation 18 | Relative L2 Error0.0842 | 6 | |
| Solving Allen-Cahn equation | Allen-Cahn equation 17 | ReL2 Error8.12e-5 | 6 | |
| Solving partial differential equations | 1D convection-dominated equation epsilon = 10^-6 (test) | Relative L2 Error2.79e-6 | 6 |