Are First-Order Diffusion Samplers Really Slower? A Fast Forward-Value Approach
About
Higher-order ODE solvers have become a standard tool for accelerating diffusion probabilistic model (DPM) sampling, motivating the widespread view that first-order methods are inherently slower and that increasing discretization order is the primary path to faster generation. This paper challenges this belief and revisits acceleration from a complementary angle: beyond solver order, the placement of DPM evaluations along the reverse-time dynamics can substantially affect sampling accuracy in the low-neural function evaluation (NFE) regime. We propose a novel training-free, first-order sampler whose leading discretization error has the opposite sign to that of DDIM. Algorithmically, the method approximates the forward-value evaluation via a cheap one-step lookahead predictor. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that the resulting sampler provably approximates the ideal forward-value trajectory while retaining first-order convergence. Empirically, across standard image generation benchmarks (CIFAR-10, ImageNet, FFHQ, and LSUN), the proposed sampler consistently improves sample quality under the same NFE budget and can be competitive with, and sometimes outperform, state-of-the-art higher-order samplers. Overall, the results suggest that the placement of DPM evaluations provides an additional and largely independent design angle for accelerating diffusion sampling.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconditional Image Generation | CIFAR-10 | FID3.46 | 171 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | FID2.51 | 114 | |
| Conditional Image Generation | CIFAR-10 | FID3.18 | 71 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 512 | FID3.06 | 57 | |
| Image Generation | FFHQ 512x512 latent (test) | FID6.46 | 25 | |
| Image Generation | LSUN Bedroom latent (test) | FID4.65 | 25 |