Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

DA-DPO: Cost-efficient Difficulty-aware Preference Optimization for Reducing MLLM Hallucinations

About

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has shown strong potential for mitigating hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, existing multimodal DPO approaches often suffer from overfitting due to the difficulty imbalance in preference data. Our analysis shows that MLLMs tend to overemphasize easily distinguishable preference pairs, which hinders fine-grained hallucination suppression and degrades overall performance. To address this issue, we propose Difficulty-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (DA-DPO), a cost-effective framework designed to balance the learning process. DA-DPO consists of two main components: (1) Difficulty Estimation leverages pre-trained vision--language models with complementary generative and contrastive objectives, whose outputs are integrated via a distribution-aware voting strategy to produce robust difficulty scores without additional training; and (2) Difficulty-Aware Training reweights preference pairs based on their estimated difficulty, down-weighting easy samples while emphasizing harder ones to alleviate overfitting. This framework enables more effective preference optimization by prioritizing challenging examples, without requiring new data or extra fine-tuning stages. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DA-DPO consistently improves multimodal preference optimization, yielding stronger robustness to hallucinations and better generalization across standard benchmarks, while remaining computationally efficient. The project page is available at https://artanic30.github.io/project_pages/DA-DPO/.

Longtian Qiu, Shan Ning, Chuyu Zhang, Jiaxuan Sun, Xuming He• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Referring Expression ComprehensionRefCOCOg (val)--
300
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy87.4
174
Visual Question AnsweringMMBench (MMB)
Accuracy77.8
169
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE (Random)--
152
Multimodal EvaluationMMBench--
146
Multimodal Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
Average Score44.2
140
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Popular--
100
Generative HallucinationAMBER Generative--
81
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal--
62
Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
Accuracy55.4
37
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update