Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

S2M-Net: Spectral-Spatial Mixing for Medical Image Segmentation with Morphology-Aware Adaptive Loss

About

Medical image segmentation requires balancing local precision for boundary-critical clinical applications, global context for anatomical coherence, and computational efficiency for deployment on limited data and hardware a trilemma that existing architectures fail to resolve. Although convolutional networks provide local precision at $\mathcal{O}(n)$ cost but limited receptive fields, vision transformers achieve global context through $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ self-attention at prohibitive computational expense, causing overfitting on small clinical datasets. We propose S2M-Net, a 4.7M-parameter architecture that achieves $\mathcal{O}(HW \log HW)$ global context through two synergistic innovations: (i) Spectral-Selective Token Mixer (SSTM), which exploits the spectral concentration of medical images via truncated 2D FFT with learnable frequency filtering and content-gated spatial projection, avoiding quadratic attention cost while maintaining global receptive fields; and (ii) Morphology-Aware Adaptive Segmentation Loss (MASL), which automatically analyzes structure characteristics (compactness, tubularity, irregularity, scale) to modulate five complementary loss components through constrained learnable weights, eliminating manual per-dataset tuning. Comprehensive evaluation in 16 medical imaging datasets that span 8 modalities demonstrates state-of-the-art performance: 96.12\% Dice on polyp segmentation, 83.77\% on surgical instruments (+17.85\% over the prior art) and 80.90\% on brain tumors, with consistent 3-18\% improvements over specialized baselines while using 3.5--6$\times$ fewer parameters than transformer-based methods.

Md. Sanaullah Chowdhury Lameya Sabrin• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Medical Image SegmentationBUSI (test)
Dice84.34
121
Medical Image SegmentationKvasir-SEG (test)--
78
Medical Image SegmentationCVC-ClinicDB (test)
Dice95.43
60
Medical Image SegmentationISIC 2018 (test)
Dice Score89.99
57
Medical Image SegmentationCVC-ColonDB (test)
Dice Score0.9075
50
Medical Image SegmentationGlaS (test)
Dice Score93.54
44
SegmentationSTARE (test)
Soft Dice81.45
31
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVE (test)
Dice Score83.2
26
Medical Image SegmentationBraTS 2020 (test)
Dice Score80.9
18
Medical Image SegmentationPH2 (test)
Dice Score94.45
18
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update