Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SWE-Lego: Pushing the Limits of Supervised Fine-tuning for Software Issue Resolving

About

We present SWE-Lego, a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) recipe designed to achieve state-ofthe-art performance in software engineering (SWE) issue resolving. In contrast to prevalent methods that rely on complex training paradigms (e.g., mid-training, SFT, reinforcement learning, and their combinations), we explore how to push the limits of a lightweight SFT-only approach for SWE tasks. SWE-Lego comprises three core building blocks, with key findings summarized as follows: 1) the SWE-Lego dataset, a collection of 32k highquality task instances and 18k validated trajectories, combining real and synthetic data to complement each other in both quality and quantity; 2) a refined SFT procedure with error masking and a difficulty-based curriculum, which demonstrably improves action quality and overall performance. Empirical results show that with these two building bricks alone,the SFT can push SWE-Lego models to state-of-the-art performance among open-source models of comparable size on SWE-bench Verified: SWE-Lego-Qwen3-8B reaches 42.2%, and SWE-Lego-Qwen3-32B attains 52.6%. 3) We further evaluate and improve test-time scaling (TTS) built upon the SFT foundation. Based on a well-trained verifier, SWE-Lego models can be significantly boosted--for example, 42.2% to 49.6% and 52.6% to 58.8% under TTS@16 for the 8B and 32B models, respectively.

Chaofan Tao, Jierun Chen, Yuxin Jiang, Kaiqi Kou, Shaowei Wang, Ruoyu Wang, Xiaohui Li, Sidi Yang, Yiming Du, Jianbo Dai, Zhiming Mao, Xinyu Wang, Lifeng Shang, Haoli Bai• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Software Engineering Issue ResolutionSWE-bench Verified
Resolution Rate52.6
110
Agentic CodingSWE-bench Verified
Percentage Resolved52.6
71
Software EngineeringSWE-bench Verified
Accuracy37.6
43
Software Engineering Issue SolvingSWE-bench Verified
Accuracy51
15
Terminal Task ExecutionTerminal-bench 2.0
Success Rate0.7
15
Function CallingBFCL Parity
Accuracy81
14
General AI Assistant TaskGAIA-127
Accuracy12.9
14
Financial Agent TaskFinanceAgent-Terminal
Accuracy (%)15.3
14
Medical Agentic ReasoningMedAgentBench
Accuracy36.2
10
AgentSWE-bench Verified
Accuracy37.6
9
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update