Cross-modal Proxy Evolving for OOD Detection with Vision-Language Models
About
Reliable zero-shot detection of out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs is critical for deploying vision-language models in open-world settings. However, the lack of labeled negatives in zero-shot OOD detection necessitates proxy signals that remain effective under distribution shift. Existing negative-label methods rely on a fixed set of textual proxies, which (i) sparsely sample the semantic space beyond in-distribution (ID) classes and (ii) remain static while only visual features drift, leading to cross-modal misalignment and unstable predictions. In this paper, we propose CoEvo, a training- and annotation-free test-time framework that performs bidirectional, sample-conditioned adaptation of both textual and visual proxies. Specifically, CoEvo introduces a proxy-aligned co-evolution mechanism to maintain two evolving proxy caches, which dynamically mines contextual textual negatives guided by test images and iteratively refines visual proxies, progressively realigning cross-modal similarities and enlarging local OOD margins. Finally, we dynamically re-weight the contributions of dual-modal proxies to obtain a calibrated OOD score that is robust to distribution shift. Extensive experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that CoEvo achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving AUROC by 1.33% and reducing FPR95 by 45.98% on ImageNet-1K compared to strong negative-label baselines.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOD Detection | ImageNet-1K OOD (Average: OpenImage-O, Texture, iNaturalist, ImageNet-O) 1.0 (test) | AUROC97.95 | 61 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet 1k (test) | FPR9510.22 | 49 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet SUN | FPR@954.42 | 43 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | OpenOOD Far-OoD average v1.5 | AUROC96.7 | 39 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | OpenOOD Near-OoD average v1.5 | AUROC0.7537 | 39 | |
| OOD Detection | ImageNet-1k ID Places OOD | AUROC95.8 | 35 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | ImageNet-1K (ID) vs Textures (OOD) (test) | FPR9512.42 | 34 | |
| OOD Detection | iNaturalist (OOD) / ImageNet-1k (ID) 1.0 (test) | FPR950.46 | 33 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-1K ID | Accuracy67.36 | 12 |