Universal Latent Homeomorphic Manifolds: A Framework for Cross-Domain Representation Unification
About
We present the Universal Latent Homeomorphic Manifold (ULHM), a framework that unifies semantic representations (e.g., human descriptions, diagnostic labels) and observation-driven machine representations (e.g., pixel intensities, sensor readings) into a single latent structure. Despite originating from fundamentally different pathways, both modalities capture the same underlying reality. We establish \emph{homeomorphism}, a continuous bijection preserving topological structure, as the mathematical criterion for determining when latent manifolds induced by different semantic-observation pairs can be rigorously unified. This criterion provides theoretical guarantees for three critical applications: (1) semantic-guided sparse recovery from incomplete observations, (2) cross-domain transfer learning with verified structural compatibility, and (3) zero-shot compositional learning via valid transfer from semantic to observation space. Our framework learns continuous manifold-to-manifold transformations through conditional variational inference, avoiding brittle point-to-point mappings. We develop practical verification algorithms, including trust, continuity, and Wasserstein distance metrics, that empirically validate homeomorphic structure from finite samples. Experiments demonstrate: (1) sparse image recovery from 5% of CelebA pixels and MNIST digit reconstruction at multiple sparsity levels, (2) cross-domain classifier transfer achieving 86.73% accuracy from MNIST to Fashion-MNIST without retraining, and (3) zero-shot classification on unseen classes achieving 78.76% on CIFAR-10. Critically, the homeomorphism criterion determines when different semantic-observation pairs share compatible latent structure, enabling principled unification into universal representations and providing a mathematical foundation for decomposing general foundation models into domain-specific components.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | Fashion MNIST (test) | Accuracy86.73 | 568 | |
| Sparse Recovery | CelebA (test) | MSE0.0247 | 40 | |
| Image Reconstruction | MNIST | MSE0.021 | 24 | |
| Classification | MNIST (test) | Accuracy96.97 | 14 | |
| Image Classification | MNIST (unseen classes 5-9) | Accuracy89.47 | 9 | |
| Image Classification | Fashion-MNIST unseen classes 5-9 | Accuracy84.7 | 9 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (unseen classes 5-9) | Accuracy78.76 | 9 |