Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

A Quantum-Driven Evolutionary Framework for Solving High-Dimensional Sharpe Ratio Portfolio Optimization

About

High-dimensional portfolio optimization faces significant computational challenges under complex constraints, with traditional optimization methods struggling to balance convergence speed and global exploration capability. To address this, firstly, we introduce an enhanced Sharpe ratio-based model that incorporates all constraints into the objective function using adaptive penalty terms, transforming the original constrained problem into an unconstrained single-objective formulation. This approach preserves financial interpretability while simplifying algorithmic implementation. To efficiently solve the resulting high-dimensional optimization problem, we develop a Quantum Hybrid Differential Evolution (QHDE) algorithm, which introduces a dynamic quantum tunneling mechanism that enables individuals to probabilistically escape local optima, dramatically enhancing global exploration and solution flexibility. To further improve performance, a good point set-chaos reverse learning strategy generates a well-dispersed initial population, providing a robust and diverse starting point. Meanwhile, a dynamic elite pool combined with Cauchy-Gaussian hybrid perturbations maintains population diversity and mitigates premature convergence, ensuring stable and high-quality solutions. Experimental validation on CEC benchmarks and real-world portfolios involving 20 to 80 assets demonstrates that QHDE's performance improves by up to 96.6%. It attains faster convergence, higher solution precision, and greater robustness than seven state-of-the-art counterparts, thereby confirming its suitability for complex, high-dimensional portfolio optimization.

Mingyang Yu, Jiaqi Zhang, Haorui Yang, Adam Slowik, Jun Zhang, Jing Xu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Numerical OptimizationCEC F3 2022
Average Score600
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F10 2022
Average Value2.51e+3
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F1 2022
Average Value2.44e+4
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F2 2022
Average449.1
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC 10-dimensional 2020
Wins Count2
10
Numerical OptimizationCEC F7 2022
Avg Objective Value2.04e+3
8
Numerical OptimizationCEC F8 2022
Average2.23e+3
8
Numerical OptimizationCEC F12 2022
Average2.94e+3
8
Numerical OptimizationCEC 2022
Friedman Average2.35
8
Numerical OptimizationCEC F5 2022
Average Value941.5
8
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update