Neural Induction of Finite-State Transducers
About
Finite-State Transducers (FSTs) are effective models for string-to-string rewriting tasks, often providing the efficiency necessary for high-performance applications, but constructing transducers by hand is difficult. In this work, we propose a novel method for automatically constructing unweighted FSTs following the hidden state geometry learned by a recurrent neural network. We evaluate our methods on real-world datasets for morphological inflection, grapheme-to-phoneme prediction, and historical normalization, showing that the constructed FSTs are highly accurate and robust for many datasets, substantially outperforming classical transducer learning algorithms by up to 87% accuracy on held-out test sets.
Michael Ginn, Alexis Palmer, Mans Hulden• 2026
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grapheme-to-Phoneme | SIGMORPHON 2020 (test) | -- | 10 | |
| Historical normalization | hun historical normalization (test) | Accuracy31.6 | 4 | |
| Historical normalization | swe historical normalization (test) | Accuracy0.579 | 4 | |
| Historical normalization | slv historical normalization (test) | Accuracy80.1 | 4 | |
| Historical normalization | spa historical normalization (test) | Accuracy64.6 | 4 | |
| Morphological Inflection | aka morphological inflection (test) | Accuracy97.5 | 4 | |
| Morphological Inflection | ceb morphological inflection (test) | Accuracy86.5 | 4 | |
| Morphological Inflection | crh morphological inflection (test) | Accuracy88.8 | 4 | |
| Morphological Inflection | czn morphological inflection (test) | Accuracy66.6 | 4 | |
| Morphological Inflection | dje morphological inflection (test) | Accuracy75 | 4 |
Showing 10 of 30 rows