Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

MAS-Orchestra: Understanding and Improving Multi-Agent Reasoning Through Holistic Orchestration and Controlled Benchmarks

About

While multi-agent systems (MAS) promise elevated intelligence through coordination of agents, current approaches to automatic MAS design under-deliver. Such shortcomings stem from two key factors: (1) methodological complexity - agent orchestration is performed using sequential, code-level execution that limits global system-level holistic reasoning and scales poorly with agent complexity - and (2) efficacy uncertainty - MAS are deployed without understanding if there are tangible benefits compared to single-agent systems (SAS). We propose MASOrchestra, a training-time framework that formulates MAS orchestration as a function-calling reinforcement learning problem with holistic orchestration, generating an entire MAS at once. In MAS-Orchestra, complex, goal-oriented subagents are abstracted as callable functions, enabling global reasoning over system structure while hiding internal execution details. To rigorously study when and why MAS are beneficial, we introduce MASBENCH, a controlled benchmark that characterizes tasks along five axes: Depth, Horizon, Breadth, Parallel, and Robustness. Our analysis reveals that MAS gains depend critically on task structure, verification protocols, and the capabilities of both orchestrator and subagents, rather than holding universally. Guided by these insights, MAS-Orchestra achieves consistent improvements on public benchmarks including mathematical reasoning, multi-hop QA, and search-based QA, while achieving more than 10x efficiency over strong baselines. Together, MAS-Orchestra and MASBENCH enable better training and understanding of MAS in the pursuit of multi-agent intelligence.

Zixuan Ke, Yifei Ming, Austin Xu, Ryan Chin, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Prathyusha Jwalapuram, Jiayu Wang, Semih Yavuz, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-hop Question AnsweringHotpotQA
Avg@8 Accuracy49
32
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24
Avg@8 Accuracy66.25
9
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 25
AIME 25 Avg@8 Accuracy61.25
9
Multi-Agent ReasoningAIME 24
Calls51
9
Multi-Agent ReasoningGPQA
Calls261
9
Out-of-Domain ReasoningGPQA
Avg@8 Accuracy65.21
9
Web Browsing ReasoningBrowseComp+
Avg@8 Accuracy11
7
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update